Comments on: the full horror of rock city (part 2) http://www.pzed.ca/words/2008/01/11/the-full-horror-of-rock-city-part-2/ what do you read, m'lord? Sun, 04 Oct 2009 00:35:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: jodi http://www.pzed.ca/words/2008/01/11/the-full-horror-of-rock-city-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19861 jodi Sat, 12 Jan 2008 15:45:25 +0000 http://www.pzed.ca/words/archives/2008/the-full-horror-of-rock-city-part-2/#comment-19861 Yes, I believe it does. Yes, I believe it does.

]]> By: pzed http://www.pzed.ca/words/2008/01/11/the-full-horror-of-rock-city-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19855 pzed Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:57:58 +0000 http://www.pzed.ca/words/archives/2008/the-full-horror-of-rock-city-part-2/#comment-19855 Yes, that too. Does flickr count duplicate views? If you go back to check a particularly fascinating comment thread, does the photo get a view each time? Yes, that too. Does flickr count duplicate views? If you go back to check a particularly fascinating comment thread, does the photo get a view each time?

]]> By: jodi http://www.pzed.ca/words/2008/01/11/the-full-horror-of-rock-city-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19851 jodi Sat, 12 Jan 2008 13:28:10 +0000 http://www.pzed.ca/words/archives/2008/the-full-horror-of-rock-city-part-2/#comment-19851 No, that's not what I mean. I mean, if I'm looking at someone's photostream, I'm more likely to click on an image if it already has comments, because if I'm interested in an image, I'm also interested in its comments. But if I'm interested in an image (but only mildly so), then I don't bother opening it if there are no comments to view. So I said I should comment on the photos but it could be anybody, so long as there are comments. No, that’s not what I mean. I mean, if I’m looking at someone’s photostream, I’m more likely to click on an image if it already has comments, because if I’m interested in an image, I’m also interested in its comments. But if I’m interested in an image (but only mildly so), then I don’t bother opening it if there are no comments to view. So I said I should comment on the photos but it could be anybody, so long as there are comments.

]]> By: pzed http://www.pzed.ca/words/2008/01/11/the-full-horror-of-rock-city-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19824 pzed Sat, 12 Jan 2008 01:24:58 +0000 http://www.pzed.ca/words/archives/2008/the-full-horror-of-rock-city-part-2/#comment-19824 I get what you're saying, here, but it does make it sound as though you're much better known on the internet than I, which seems a little, um, nevermind. I get what you’re saying, here, but it does make it sound as though you’re much better known on the internet than I, which seems a little, um, nevermind.

]]> By: jodi http://www.pzed.ca/words/2008/01/11/the-full-horror-of-rock-city-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-19821 jodi Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:32:55 +0000 http://www.pzed.ca/words/archives/2008/the-full-horror-of-rock-city-part-2/#comment-19821 Hmm. I have a thought on what makes certain images popular. I left a comment on this photo last night. I know that when I'm looking at some people's photostreams (not all, just the people whose comment threads I'm interested in) I'll open the images with comments in order to read them, and just view the other photos in the stream. If other people do this as well it could skew the numbers. Perhaps I should start commenting on only your photos with fewer views, to see if the views start increasing. Hmm. I have a thought on what makes certain images popular. I left a comment on this photo last night. I know that when I’m looking at some people’s photostreams (not all, just the people whose comment threads I’m interested in) I’ll open the images with comments in order to read them, and just view the other photos in the stream. If other people do this as well it could skew the numbers.

Perhaps I should start commenting on only your photos with fewer views, to see if the views start increasing.

]]>