<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: nit picking, blip edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pzed.ca/words/2009/03/23/nit-picking-blip-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pzed.ca/words/2009/03/23/nit-picking-blip-edition/</link>
	<description>what do you read, m'lord?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:31:29 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Rochkind</title>
		<link>http://www.pzed.ca/words/2009/03/23/nit-picking-blip-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-78618</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Rochkind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pzed.ca/words/?p=246#comment-78618</guid>
		<description>The trick is that, thinking like a programmer, a blip isn&#039;t REALLY a song plus a comment, it&#039;s an abstract data object that has both a song and a comment attached to it. That&#039;s how a programmer thinks, but it&#039;s awfully confusing and pointless to try to explain that to a user. 

So I&#039;m seeing a programmer writing that, and describing a blip as &quot;a combination of a song and a comment&quot; because that seems clearer to a Normal Person, but then forgetting this mental model when they got to end of the paragraph and reverting to their default programmer mental model, where things are attached. 

I&#039;m up way too late writing random comments on blogs about such things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trick is that, thinking like a programmer, a blip isn&#8217;t REALLY a song plus a comment, it&#8217;s an abstract data object that has both a song and a comment attached to it. That&#8217;s how a programmer thinks, but it&#8217;s awfully confusing and pointless to try to explain that to a user. </p>
<p>So I&#8217;m seeing a programmer writing that, and describing a blip as &#8220;a combination of a song and a comment&#8221; because that seems clearer to a Normal Person, but then forgetting this mental model when they got to end of the paragraph and reverting to their default programmer mental model, where things are attached. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m up way too late writing random comments on blogs about such things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pzed</title>
		<link>http://www.pzed.ca/words/2009/03/23/nit-picking-blip-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-78615</link>
		<dc:creator>pzed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pzed.ca/words/?p=246#comment-78615</guid>
		<description>aw, shucks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aw, shucks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.pzed.ca/words/2009/03/23/nit-picking-blip-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-78599</link>
		<dc:creator>kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 21:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pzed.ca/words/?p=246#comment-78599</guid>
		<description>I love you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
